The City of Fort Wayne is so stupid sometimes…

Posted by Mike Sylvester - 8/28/09 @ 10:40 pm - Filed Under Featured, Local Politics

I have put off posting about this topic for a couple of weeks because it angered me so much at the time.

The City of Fort Wayne has committed the taxpayers to spending millions of dollars downtown; even when everyone knows that a majority of Fort Wayne citizens opposed the Harrison Square project.

Recently Aunt Millie’s Bakeries wanted to expand their downtown operation.  As part of this expansion they wanted to close part of Pearl street.  Basically the expansion would have made it easier for the company to load and unload their delivery trucks.  Supposedly 1000 vehicles use this street per day during the week; 700 of them are connected with Aunt Millie’s.

As part of their proposal the company was going to handle the landscaping and pay for the project entirely.

The City Administration and a few local people opposed this project.  The City Administration increased the landscaping requirements so much that Aunt Millie’s ended up withdrawing their petition.

What a load of (fill in the blank)…

These idiots in the Mayor’s Administration are willing to funnel millions of dollars on downtown projects that have clearly failed and yet they are completely unwilling to support an existing downtown employer with a simple project.

Several of the high powered business owners who supported the Harrison Square Project are Fort Wayne business owners who abandoned downtown and built new buildings near the county lines (or over the county lines).  These business owners fled downtown to avoid debacles just like what happened to Aunt Millies.

At this rate the City of Fort Wayne will drive off the few downtown business left and all we will be left with downtown are failed projects like Harrison Square and the Grand Wayne Center as well as vacant office buildings.

Sometimes I get so angry at the ineptitude displayed by the City of Fort Wayne…

The News Sentinel has a quote from Karen Goldner that really irritated me.  I like Karen Goldner and I overall think she has been a strong addition to City Council.  She and I do not agree on many things; however, she works hard and she analyzes issues in a very competent manner.  She represents my City Council district.

She is quoted in the News Sentinel as saying:

Karen Golder, D-2nd, said trucks and truck docks won’t present the most aesthetically pleasing view downtown.

You have got to be kidding me Karen!

Loading docks look a lot better then vacant and abandoned buildings.

Seriously, in my opinion if you want downtown to succeed you must do two things as a member of City Council or a member of the City Administration:

1.  Support downtown businesses.  Downtown will not succeed unless more people work downtown.

2.  Create housing downtown, which will draw even more poeple downtown.  Heck the City of Fort Wayne paid a consultant to tell them that; however, now the City is considering allowing Hardball Capital to build some office space instead of condominiums at The Harrison.

This just infuriates me.

How about you?

Mike Sylvester

Comments

21 Responses to “The City of Fort Wayne is so stupid sometimes…”

  1. Phil Marx on August 28th, 2009 11:55 pm

    Mike there are only two possile explanations I can think of for this.

    1) Popp (Aunt Millie’s CEO) is a contributor to Republican campaigns, and the current administratin is Democratic. Local government is not about improving things for the majority of the residents. It is about political cronyism.

    2) The politicos are so used to people coming to them and asking for money that they were actually taken off guard with the simple request to do what government should actually be doing, which is simply to facilitate (not manage and pay for) the development and expansion of private enterprise. Never having encountered such a situation before, they felt they had no choice but to vote against it.

  2. Jeff Pruitt on August 29th, 2009 9:09 am

    I think Phil hit the nail on the head with point #1.

  3. Frank on August 29th, 2009 9:19 am

    Last time I checked this was street vacation that was held up by City Council. Isn’t there a 5-4 majority for the Republicans at the table?

  4. Mike Sylvester on August 29th, 2009 9:27 am

    Jeff and Phil,

    You both actually think this is political?

    I think it is just incompetence…

    Mike

  5. Honest Abe on August 29th, 2009 10:05 am

    I agree, it’s #1. Popp was Kelty’s major benefactor and some people cannot get over that fact.

  6. Phil Marx on August 29th, 2009 11:10 am

    Mike;

    It’s very likely that many of the suspicious actions taken by government are simply due to incompetence, and trying to cover up this incompetence is likey the reason for the government’s lack of openness. But whenever any government routinely offers either misinformation or simply refuses to inform it’s citizens about the facts of what it is doing, the claims of conspiracists are bolstered.

    In my opinion, the Henry Administration has shown itself to be only a little more open and genuine than it’s predecessor was. I think this legitimately allows for wondering if political favors and disfavours are a significant factor in government’s decisions.

  7. Phil Marx on August 29th, 2009 11:16 am

    Frank;

    We can proudly claim that the government here is not divided along party lines.

    We have three true fiscal conservatives (Harper, Shoaff and Smith). Two are Republicans and one is a Democrat.

    And when it comes to issues which the Mayor strongly supports, his employee Officer/Councilman Bender hardly ever lets him down - even though they are nominally of different parties.

  8. Evert Mol on August 29th, 2009 11:40 am

    The fascination with “revitalizing” downtown still puzzles me. In fact I don’t really understand what we’re trying to accomplish besides accomodating the major downton property owners. Fifty years ago Fort Wayne generated wealth from large manufacturing plants within the city limits. The people who made their wealth from these plants lived, worked and shopped within the original city limits. The major retail district was downtown.

    All that has changed. Manufacturing died, people migrated outward away from the old core and their wealth went with them. Services followed them to the suburbs. “Downtown” is now basically another office district sustained mostly by government entities. So what makes downtown more deserving of taxpayer supported projects than any other part of the city?

  9. John Brown on August 29th, 2009 3:07 pm

    I believe Tom Smith (R-1st district) had some questions about the proposal.

    Since he is on the Plan Commission as well, he gets two chances to stop things like this if he wants.

  10. Robert Enders on August 31st, 2009 11:37 am

    Evert,
    I agree that downtown does not deserve special treatment. But it happens to be the part of town that councilmembers and newspaper reporters see everyday.

  11. Cole on August 31st, 2009 12:52 pm

    This coming from the guy that is pissed off every time someone gets a tax abatement or property deals for Harrison Square?

    You should be heralding this as a strong move on the city council’s part for upholding a to some sort of standards. What you neglect to mention is that the plan called for $400k of investment to help Aunt Millie’s deal with their delivery trucks. No jobs created.

    So you are saying that the city council should have vacated a street for Aunt Millie’s to throw up a $400k car port? Com’on mike, now you’re just looking for something to get angry about.

    If the council approved this, it would be no holds bar on what people thought their entitlement of government aid should be for any small investment downtown.

    Thank you city council for not selling our streets, especially at a blue light special rate

    Mike, to use your words, Good Grief.

  12. Mike Sylvester on August 31st, 2009 3:11 pm

    Cole,

    I have no idea what you mean by the plan called for $400,000 of investment to help Aunt Millies.

    Please be more specific.

    Mike

  13. Cole on August 31st, 2009 3:58 pm

    http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090626/NEWS/906260310

    Reread what I wrote. I didn’t say help Aunt Millie’s I said it was for them to help them deal with their trucks.

    That is not the point of my response. A $400k investment in my mind does not justify a vacation of a street, PERIOD. Now, if they were going to expand their operations from their current building to their parking lot across Pearl Street. Increase the number of jobs, with a significant amount of investment. An investment that convincingly says, “Aunt Millie’s is committed to downtown”. Then I would say the city council has something to consider. Pearl Street is worth more than a $400k car port.

  14. John Brown on August 31st, 2009 4:28 pm

    Cole,

    If a business has been downtown since 1901, how much longer do they need to be there before you feel they are committed to the area?

  15. Cole on August 31st, 2009 4:57 pm

    From the article:
    “The company, formerly known as Perfection Bakeries, was founded in 1901 and has about 250 employees. The expansion project would not add jobs but would solidify the company’s commitment to downtown, Popp said.”

    If the president brings it up, apparently they have not ruled out moving locations. The project is not happening, therefore their commitment is not solidified.

    John, again the point of my comment was that mike said that the council should have approved the vacation of Pearl Street, while I contend that a minimal investment ($400k) and zero added jobs does not justify a vacation of a street, PLUS tax abatements.

    I just find it funny, because I followed all of Mike’s complaints over the usages of abatements, and this seems to go contrary to all of what he said earlier.

  16. Cole on September 2nd, 2009 9:12 am

    yes, no, maybe so? thread closed? winner?

  17. Mike Sylvester on September 2nd, 2009 11:14 pm

    Cole,

    I overall think you are right.

    I did not realize that the City would have to spend $400,000.

    Knowing that, I would oppose the project.

    Mike

  18. Cole on September 3rd, 2009 11:02 am

    Mike,

    What? Seriously? Did you read anything I wrote?

    Aunt Millie’s was going to spend a total of $400k to install semi docks. In return they were asking to shut down a section of Pearl street, and they were asking for tax abatements.

    I am contending that for Aunt Millie’s to invest $400k is not a fair swap with the city to vacate a street.

  19. Mike Sylvester on September 3rd, 2009 3:03 pm

    Cole,

    I did read what you wrote…

    The City approves well over 95% of all tax abatements; I disagree with that; however, it is their current policy.

    I did misread what you wrote.

    I am back to my original stance.

    The City should have done what Anunt Millies wanted.

    Mike

  20. Cole on September 3rd, 2009 4:34 pm

    You think the city should vacate a street and give them tax abatements for 400k improvement?

    I don’t believe you actually think that. That is just laughable.

  21. USA Nomad on September 8th, 2009 11:22 pm

    How many ways do you want to describe stupid -
    bad restaurants
    a bartender for a mayor
    talk show hosts that couldn’t inspire an 8th grade drop-out
    terrible roads - (except I69 - which is under utilized)
    no East/West thorough fare
    an ugly downtown
    highlight for local residents is to sit in their garage and listen to police scanners
    a gang problem out of control
    a city school administrator wanting to spend useless money to promote herself to a larger school district
    and yes to be redundant - terrible restaurants - Casa - Granite City - Hunan - Etc — ALL below standard

    Pluses include Hyde Bros Books and Allen Co Library

    what city boasts about a kid’s zoo or a world famous fire escape

    how about most all intersections with barely any street signs

    entrances to one-way streets unidentified

    of course if you don’t have money or inclination to go to a REAL professional sports game - you can see minor league baseball- hockey - basketball –whoopee - let me catch my breadth

    let’s look at city politics and spending - enlarge and renovate Memorial Coliseum and then build Grand Wayne Center to compete against it with neither having 50% scheduled events

    how about building a sports arena - having lots of parking - Interstate access and then tearing it down the year it is paid for??? how do you spell dumb?

    Park System hiking trails - not properly marked - and NO loops

    Sorry for the negatives - I just had a TERRIBLE meal at a Casa restaurant and the whole FW experience is grating on me

    I forgot I am in FW and it is time to set my clock back 40 years — of course is that daylight time or not?!?!?

Leave a Reply